About Scovant

We're building the measurement system for the agentic web.

For thirty years, the web's been built for humans with eyeballs and impatience. The next ten years it gets used by something quieter: agents acting on behalf of those humans. Same browsers, completely different failure modes — and almost nobody is measuring.

The thesis

The agentic web needs a scoreboard.

You can't fix what you can't see, and you can't compare what you don't measure the same way every time. We think there should be one number — comparable, public, reproducible — for whether a site is going to work when an agent shows up.

01
Agents will route more commerce than you think.
Conservative analysts have agents at 8% of e-commerce by 2027. Less conservative ones, 30%. Either way, today the floor is broken.
02
The compatibility surface is small but specific.
There are about twenty things sites do that break agents, and ninety percent of teams haven't heard of half of them. Lighthouse doesn't check for them.
03
A score in the footer is going to matter.
Verifiable compatibility scores will become a trust signal. Like SOC 2, or HTTPS in the address bar — boring once everyone has one, embarrassing if you don't.
The landscape

How we got here.

2022
ChatGPT ships.
Suddenly a billion people are talking to a language model. Within a year, plugins, then function calling, then the words "agent" and "tool use" enter the chat.
2024
The first wave of browsing agents.
OpenAI's Operator, Anthropic's computer use, Adept, Browser-use, Manus. They can drive a browser. They mostly fail at checkout.
Q1 2026
Agent revenue is real but unmeasurable.
Three of the top ten US retailers are quietly reporting double-digit agent-driven revenue. No one knows whether the other 90% works for agents or not.
May 2026
We start Scovant.
Five years from the agentic web being normal, zero years from anyone agreeing on what "agent-ready" means.
What we believe

How we work, in four sentences.

Boring is a feature.
A measurement tool has one job — be the same on Tuesday as it was last month. We pick deterministic rules over clever ones, every single time.
The score is open.
Every rule we evaluate is documented. Every weight, every threshold, every multiplier — published in full in our Scoring methodology docs, like a benchmark suite. We welcome corrections.
Public reports by default.
The web is public. So are Scovant reports. Sites can opt out, but the default is verifiable, link-able, embed-able compatibility.
Devs read the docs.
Our buyers are engineers and the team they work with. We don't hide pricing, gate features behind sales calls, or use “starting at” copy. Tools should explain themselves.

We'd love your site on our scoreboard.

Scan once. Tell us what we missed. Help us shape the rule set everyone ends up using.